Who is better, Sabalenka or Pennetta?
Aryna Sabalenka leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Flavia Pennetta — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Aryna Sabalenka and Flavia Pennetta level at 81.2. Aryna Sabalenka leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak. Flavia Pennetta leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Sabalenka wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Pennetta wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/aryna-sabalenka-vs-flavia-pennetta
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Sabalenka leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇾 Sabalenka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 17 |
| 🇮🇹 Pennetta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SabalenkaActive | PennettaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam titles | 4 | — |
| Australian Open titles | 2 | — |
| Weeks at No. 1 | 60 | — |
| Career titles | 20 | — |
| Year-end No. 1 | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam singles titles | — | 1 |
| WTA titles | — | 11 |
| Fed Cup titles | — | 4 |
| Doubles world No. 1 weeks | — | 4 |
| Career-high singles ranking | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Aryna Sabalenka leads with a GOAT score of 81.2 against 81.2 for Flavia Pennetta — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Pennetta scores higher on honours, longevity. Sabalenka leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Sabalenka: 81.2, Pennetta: 81.2.
Make your case for Sabalenka vs Pennetta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.