GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Callus vs Qin

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CallusWinner
83.6

Callus wins: Longevity

Qin
83.6

Qin wins: Dominance, Peak

Candidates
Locked to Swimming

Shareable URL · /compare/ashley-callus-vs-qin-haiyang

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Ashley Callus
83.6

Callus leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Olympic relay champion in 2000 and a Commonwealth Games gold medallist.

1. Ashley Callus
83.6
2. Qin Haiyang
83.6

Category breakdown

Season form · Form index per season

Career timeline · Form index per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Form index per season
1. 🇦🇺 Ashley Callus5 seasons played · career day 1,825386 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Qin Haiyang5 seasons played · career day 1,8255 major golds
-98.7% vs Callus at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Callus0045115386684
🇨🇳 Qin0001517

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCallusRetiredQinActive
Olympic gold medals1
Commonwealth titles3
Olympic Games contested3
World Championship medals3
Australian titles8
World Championship golds5
World records1
Breaststroke titles at one Worlds3
Asian Games golds3
Olympic medals1
Dominance w25%7886
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8470
Honours w20%8282
Statistics w15%8686

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Callus83.6
Qin83.6
The people
Callus
Qin

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Callus vs Qin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →