GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Cooper vs Collins

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CollinsWinner
78.2

Collins wins: Longevity, Statistics

Cooper
78.1

Cooper wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/ashley-cooper-vs-danielle-collins

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Danielle Collins
78.2

Collins leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Australian Open finalist in 2022 and a two-time NCAA singles champion.

1. Danielle Collins
78.2
2. Ashley Cooper
78.1

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇦🇺 Ashley Cooper5 seasons played · career day 1,825342 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Danielle Collins5 seasons played · career day 2,19111 titles
-96.8% vs Cooper at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇦🇺 Cooper0050109342518
🇺🇸 Collins0001622

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricCooperRetiredCollinsActive
Major singles titles4
Majors won in 19583
Australian titles2
Davis Cup titles2
Major finals6
Grand Slam finals1
WTA titles4
NCAA singles titles2
Career-high ranking7
Career match wins300
Dominance w25%8072
Peak w20%9290
Longevity w20%5874
Honours w20%8274
Statistics w15%7884

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Collins78.2
Cooper78.1
The people
Cooper
Collins

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Cooper vs Collins. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →