Who is better, Del Castillo or Carvalho?
Athenea del Castillo leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Ricardo Carvalho — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Athenea del Castillo and Ricardo Carvalho level at 82.6. Athenea del Castillo leads on Statistics, Peak. Ricardo Carvalho leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Del Castillo wins: Peak, Statistics
Carvalho wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/athenea-del-castillo-v-vs-ricardo-carvalho
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Del Castillo leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Del Castillo | 0 | 0 | 52 | 111 | 327 | 684 |
| 🇵🇹 Carvalho | 0 | 0 | 18 | 44 | 102 | 225 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Del CastilloActive | CarvalhoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Nations League titles | 1 | — |
| Spain caps | 45 | — |
| Liga F goals | 50 | — |
| Spain goals | 10 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Premier League titles | — | 3 |
| La Liga titles | — | 1 |
| Primeira Liga titles | — | 3 |
| Portugal caps | — | 89 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 76 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteAthenea del Castillo leads with a GOAT score of 82.6 against 82.6 for Ricardo Carvalho — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Carvalho scores higher on longevity. Del Castillo leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Del Castillo: 82.6, Carvalho: 82.6.
Make your case for Del Castillo vs Carvalho. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.