Who is better, Aui_2000 or frozen?
Aui_2000 leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for David "frozen" Čerňanský — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Aui_2000 above David "frozen" Čerňanský: 83.6 vs 83.5. Aui_2000 leads on Dominance, Longevity, Honours. David "frozen" Čerňanský leads on Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Aui_2000 wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours
frozen wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/aui-2000-d2-vs-frozen-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Aui_2000 leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Aui_2000 | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 298 | 646 |
| 🇸🇰 frozen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.08 | 4.39 | 8.85 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Aui_2000Retired | frozenActive |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 1 | — |
| Major titles | 2 | — |
| TI appearances | 5 | — |
| TI top-four finishes | 2 | — |
| Career prize money (USD m) | 2 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Big events won | — | 14 |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Top-20 player rankings | — | 3 |
| Career rating | — | 1.11 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 90 |
Aui_2000 leads with a GOAT score of 83.6 against 83.5 for David "frozen" Čerňanský — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
frozen scores higher on statistics. Aui_2000 leads on dominance, honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Aui_2000: 83.6, frozen: 83.5.
Make your case for Aui_2000 vs frozen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.