Who is better, Ax1Le or EternalEnvy?
Sergey "Ax1Le" Rykhtorov leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.7 for EternalEnvy — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sergey "Ax1Le" Rykhtorov above EternalEnvy: 80.8 vs 80.7. Sergey "Ax1Le" Rykhtorov leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance. EternalEnvy leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ax1Le wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
EternalEnvy wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ax1le-cs-vs-eternalenvy-d2
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ax1Le leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇷🇺 Ax1Le | 0 | 0 | 70 | 158 | 426 | 588 |
| 🇨🇦 EternalEnvy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 110 | 259 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Ax1LeActive | EternalEnvyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Big event titles | 6 | — |
| HLTV top-20 placements | 4 | — |
| Major appearances | 8 | — |
| Best rating seasons | 2 | — |
| Professional seasons | 7 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | — | 4 |
| TI appearances | — | 8 |
| TI top-eight finishes | — | 2 |
| Career seasons | — | 11 |
| Career prize money (USD m) | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 85 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Sergey "Ax1Le" Rykhtorov leads with a GOAT score of 80.8 against 80.7 for EternalEnvy — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
EternalEnvy scores higher on longevity. Ax1Le leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ax1Le: 80.8, EternalEnvy: 80.7.
Make your case for Ax1Le vs EternalEnvy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.