Who is better, Chandrasekhar or Saqlain?
Saqlain Mushtaq leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for B. S. Chandrasekhar — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Saqlain Mushtaq above B. S. Chandrasekhar: 84.8 vs 84.7. Saqlain Mushtaq leads on Honours, Dominance. B. S. Chandrasekhar leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Saqlain wins: Dominance, Honours
Chandrasekhar wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/b-s-chandrasekhar-vs-saqlain-mushtaq
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Saqlain leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇳 Chandrasekhar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 66 | 145 |
| 🇵🇰 Saqlain | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 180 | 328 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChandrasekharRetired | SaqlainRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test wickets | 242 | 208 |
| Tests played | 58 | 49 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 16 | 13 |
| Ten-wicket matches | 2 | — |
| Test bowling average | 29.74 | — |
| ODI wickets | — | 288 |
| Fastest to 100 ODI wickets (matches) | — | 53 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteSaqlain Mushtaq leads with a GOAT score of 84.8 against 84.7 for B. S. Chandrasekhar — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chandrasekhar scores higher on longevity. Saqlain leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chandrasekhar: 84.7, Saqlain: 84.8.
Make your case for Chandrasekhar vs Saqlain. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.