Who is better, Babar or Denness?
Mike Denness leads with a GOAT score of 83.3 against 83.2 for Babar Azam — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Babar vs Denness
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mike Denness above Babar Azam: 83.3 vs 83.2. Mike Denness leads on Longevity. Babar Azam leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DennessWinner
83.3Denness wins: Longevity
Babar
83.2Babar wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/babar-azam-vs-mike-denness
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Mike Denness
83.3
Denness leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Mike Denness
2. Babar Azam
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇰 Babar Azam5 years played · career day 1,825285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Mike Denness5 years played · career day 1,825262 runs
-8.1% vs Babar at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇰 Babar | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 285 | 498 |
| 🇬🇧 Denness | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 262 | 538 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Denness83.3
Babar83.2
FAQ
Where does Babar beat Denness?
Babar scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Denness leads on longevity.
How is the Babar vs Denness score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Babar: 83.2, Denness: 83.3.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Babar vs Denness. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.