Who is better, Ruth or Hartnett?
Babe Ruth leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 87.6 for Gabby Hartnett — a gap of 7.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ruth vs Hartnett
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Babe Ruth above Gabby Hartnett: 94.6 vs 87.6. Babe Ruth leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Gabby Hartnett leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RuthWinner
94.6Ruth wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Hartnett
87.6Hartnett wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/babe-ruth-vs-gabby-hartnett
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Babe Ruth
94.6
Ruth leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Babe Ruth
2. Gabby Hartnett
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Through age 23 · Form index per season
1. 🇺🇸 Babe Ruth11 home runs
1 season by age 23 · 11 per season
Setting the pace at age 23
No verified birth date for Hartnett — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 23, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | RuthRetired | HartnettRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Home runs | 714 | — |
| World Series titles | 7 | — |
| Career OPS | 1.164 | — |
| Batting average | 0.342 | — |
| RBIs | 2,214 | — |
| Pitching ERA | 2.28 | — |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 6 |
| Career home runs | — | 236 |
| Career batting average | — | 0.297 |
| Pennants won | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 99 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 92 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ruth94.6
Hartnett87.6
FAQ
Where does Hartnett beat Ruth?
Hartnett scores higher on longevity. Ruth leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
How is the Ruth vs Hartnett score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ruth: 94.6, Hartnett: 87.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ruth vs Hartnett. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.