Who is better, Ruth or Weaver?
Babe Ruth leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 60.3 for Luke Weaver — a gap of 34.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Babe Ruth above Luke Weaver: 94.6 vs 60.3. Babe Ruth leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ruth wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Weaver wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/babe-ruth-vs-ros-luke-weaver
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ruth leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 23
No verified birth date for Weaver — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 23, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | RuthRetired | WeaverActive · Pittsburgh Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| Home runs | 714 | — |
| World Series titles | 7 | — |
| Career OPS | 1.164 | — |
| Batting average | 0.342 | — |
| RBIs | 2,214 | — |
| Pitching ERA | 2.28 | — |
| MLB games | — | 336 |
| MLB wins | — | 50 |
| MLB strikeouts | — | 1,021 |
| MLB award: Baseball America High Class A All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: TEX Post-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: MiLB.com Organization All-Star | — | 1 |
| MLB award: PCL Mid-Season All-Star | — | 1 |
| Number | — | 18 |
| Dominance w25% | 100 | 57.9 |
| Peak w20% | 99 | 71.7 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 60.2 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 44 |
| Statistics w15% | 97 | 71.2 |
Babe Ruth leads with a GOAT score of 94.6 against 60.3 for Luke Weaver — a gap of 34.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Weaver does not lead any of the five categories; Ruth is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ruth: 94.6, Weaver: 60.3.
Make your case for Ruth vs Weaver. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.