Who is better, Arizmendi or Chang?
Chang Jung-koo leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Baby Arizmendi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chang Jung-koo above Baby Arizmendi: 87.8 vs 87.7. Chang Jung-koo leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Baby Arizmendi leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Arizmendi wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/baby-arizmendi-vs-chang-jung-koo
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Arizmendi | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 673 |
| 🇰🇷 Chang | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 234 | 656 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Chang Jung-koo leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.7 for Baby Arizmendi — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Arizmendi scores higher on longevity. Chang leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Arizmendi: 87.7, Chang: 87.8.
Make your case for Arizmendi vs Chang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.