Who is better, Arizmendi or Holyfield?
Baby Arizmendi leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Evander Holyfield — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Baby Arizmendi above Evander Holyfield: 87.7 vs 87.6. Baby Arizmendi leads on Statistics, Peak. Evander Holyfield leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Arizmendi wins: Peak, Statistics
Holyfield wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/baby-arizmendi-vs-evander-holyfield
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Arizmendi leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇲🇽 Arizmendi | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 673 |
| 🇺🇸 Holyfield | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 24 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ArizmendiRetired | HolyfieldRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World title reigns | 2 | — |
| Career wins | 71 | 44 |
| Career fights | 100 | — |
| Wins over world champions | 5 | — |
| Seasons active | 16 | — |
| World titles | — | 6 |
| Undisputed reigns | — | 2 |
| Knockouts | — | 29 |
| Heavyweight title reigns | — | 4 |
| Ring Magazine Fighter of the Year | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 86 |
Baby Arizmendi leads with a GOAT score of 87.7 against 87.6 for Evander Holyfield — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Holyfield scores higher on honours, longevity. Arizmendi leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Arizmendi: 87.7, Holyfield: 87.6.
Make your case for Arizmendi vs Holyfield. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.