Who is better, Baji or Abdelrahman?
Ihab Abdelrahman leads with a GOAT score of 74.0 against 73.6 for Balázs Baji — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ihab Abdelrahman above Balázs Baji: 74.0 vs 73.6. Ihab Abdelrahman leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Balázs Baji leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Abdelrahman wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Baji wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/balazs-baji-vs-ihab-abdelrahman
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Abdelrahman leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇭🇺 Baji | 0 | 0 | 48 | 102 | 228 | 626 |
| 🇪🇬 Abdelrahman | 0 | 0 | 52 | 112 | 348 | 652 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BajiRetired | AbdelrahmanRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | 1 |
| Personal best (s) | 13.15 | — |
| European Championship finals | 3 | — |
| Hungarian national titles | 10 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | 2 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 89.21 |
| African Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Diamond League podiums | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 66 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 74 | 76 |
Ihab Abdelrahman leads with a GOAT score of 74.0 against 73.6 for Balázs Baji — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Baji scores higher on longevity. Abdelrahman leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baji: 73.6, Abdelrahman: 74.0.
Make your case for Baji vs Abdelrahman. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.