Who is better, Bang or HObbit?
Bae "Bang" Jun-sik leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Abay "HObbit" Khasenov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bae "Bang" Jun-sik above Abay "HObbit" Khasenov: 83.9 vs 83.8. Bae "Bang" Jun-sik leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Abay "HObbit" Khasenov leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bang wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
HObbit wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bang-lol-vs-hobbit-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bang leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Bang | 0 | 0 | 66 | 158 | 420 | 546 |
| 🇰🇿 HObbit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.05 | 4.3 | 8.57 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BangRetired | HObbitActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 2 | — |
| LCK titles | 4 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 2 | — |
| World finals | 3 | — |
| Professional seasons | 7 | — |
| Majors won | — | 1 |
| Big events won | — | 6 |
| Top-20 player rankings | — | 1 |
| Career rating | — | 1.07 |
| Seasons at tier one | — | 11 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 88 |
Bae "Bang" Jun-sik leads with a GOAT score of 83.9 against 83.8 for Abay "HObbit" Khasenov — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
HObbit scores higher on statistics, longevity. Bang leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bang: 83.9, HObbit: 83.8.
Make your case for Bang vs HObbit. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.