Who is better, Bonansea or Belanov?
Barbara Bonansea leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Igor Belanov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Barbara Bonansea and Igor Belanov level at 85.6. Barbara Bonansea leads on Longevity, Statistics. Igor Belanov leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bonansea wins: Longevity, Statistics
Belanov wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/barbara-bonansea-v-vs-igor-belanov-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bonansea leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Bonansea | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 225 | 601 |
| 🇺🇦 Belanov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 316 | 674 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BonanseaActive | BelanovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Serie A titles | 6 | — |
| Italy caps | 100 | — |
| Italy goals | 25 | — |
| Coppa Italia titles | 4 | — |
| World Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Ballon d'Or awards | — | 1 |
| Cup Winners' Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 2 |
| Soviet Union caps | — | 33 |
| European Championship finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Barbara Bonansea leads with a GOAT score of 85.6 against 85.6 for Igor Belanov — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Belanov scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Bonansea leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bonansea: 85.6, Belanov: 85.6.
Make your case for Bonansea vs Belanov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.