Who is better, Wöckel or Baala?
Mehdi Baala leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Bärbel Wöckel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Mehdi Baala above Bärbel Wöckel: 84.2 vs 84.1. Mehdi Baala leads on Longevity, Statistics. Bärbel Wöckel leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Baala wins: Longevity, Statistics
Wöckel wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/barbel-wockel-vs-mehdi-baala
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Baala leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Wöckel | 0 | 0 | 68 | 144 | 408 | 756 |
| 🇫🇷 Baala | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 637.5 | 1,474.05 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WöckelRetired | BaalaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 4 | — |
| Individual Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| European Championship golds | 2 | — |
| Personal best 200 m | 22.03 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 2 | — |
| European titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 1 |
| 1500 m best | — | 208.25 |
| Olympic finals | — | 2 |
| National titles | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 90 |
Mehdi Baala leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Bärbel Wöckel — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Wöckel scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Baala leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wöckel: 84.1, Baala: 84.2.
Make your case for Wöckel vs Baala. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.