Who is better, Krejčíková or Mahony?
Harold Mahony leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Barbora Krejčíková — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Harold Mahony above Barbora Krejčíková: 79.7 vs 79.6. Harold Mahony leads on Longevity, Peak. Barbora Krejčíková leads on Honours, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mahony wins: Peak, Longevity
Krejčíková wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/barbora-krejcikova-vs-harold-mahony
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mahony leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇿 Krejčíková | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 21 |
| 🇮🇪 Mahony | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KrejčíkováActive | MahonyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam doubles titles | 7 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| WTA singles titles | 9 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 2 | — |
| Wimbledon titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| Irish Championships titles | — | 1 |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 1 |
| Career span in years | — | 16 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 80 |
Harold Mahony leads with a GOAT score of 79.7 against 79.6 for Barbora Krejčíková — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Krejčíková scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Mahony leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Krejčíková: 79.6, Mahony: 79.7.
Make your case for Krejčíková vs Mahony. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.