Who is better, Ross or Criqui?
Barney Ross leads with a GOAT score of 86.4 against 86.4 for Eugène Criqui — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Ross vs Criqui
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Barney Ross and Eugène Criqui level at 86.4. Barney Ross leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Eugène Criqui leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
RossWinner
86.4Ross wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Criqui
86.4Criqui wins: Longevity, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/barney-ross-vs-eugene-criqui
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Barney Ross
86.4
Ross leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Barney Ross
2. Eugène Criqui
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇫🇷 Eugène Criqui5 years played · career day 1,825268 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Barney Ross5 years played · career day 1,82554 title wins
-79.9% vs Criqui at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Ross | 0 | 0 | 9 | 21 | 54 | 74 |
| 🇫🇷 Criqui | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 268 | 559 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Ross86.4
Criqui86.4
FAQ
Where does Criqui beat Ross?
Criqui scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ross leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Ross vs Criqui score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ross: 86.4, Criqui: 86.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Ross vs Criqui. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.