Who is better, D'Oliveira or Brearley?
Basil D'Oliveira leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Walter Brearley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Basil D'Oliveira above Walter Brearley: 82.7 vs 82.6. Basil D'Oliveira leads on Longevity, Honours. Walter Brearley leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →D'Oliveira wins: Longevity, Honours
Brearley wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/basil-doliveira-vs-walter-brearley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
D'Oliveira leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 D'Oliveira | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 216 | 621 |
| 🇬🇧 Brearley | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 323 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | D'OliveiraRetired | BrearleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test runs | 2,484 | — |
| Test centuries | 5 | — |
| Test wickets | 47 | 17 |
| First-class runs | 18,919 | — |
| Tests played | 44 | — |
| First-class wickets | — | 990 |
| Wickets in one match | — | 17 |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | — | 5 |
| County championships won | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Basil D'Oliveira leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Walter Brearley — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brearley scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. D'Oliveira leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. D'Oliveira: 82.7, Brearley: 82.6.
Make your case for D'Oliveira vs Brearley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.