Who is better, Batistuta or Hazard?
Eden Hazard leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Gabriel Batistuta — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Eden Hazard above Gabriel Batistuta: 80.3 vs 80.2. Eden Hazard leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak. Gabriel Batistuta leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hazard wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Batistuta wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/batistuta-vs-eden-hazard
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hazard leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Batistuta | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 110 |
| 🇧🇪 Hazard | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 41 | 109 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BatistutaRetired | HazardRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career goals | 344 | — |
| Serie A goals | 184 | — |
| Serie A titles | 1 | — |
| Argentina goals | 56 | — |
| Copa América titles | 2 | — |
| Serie A top scorer | 1 | — |
| Premier League titles | — | 2 |
| Europa League titles | — | 2 |
| PFA Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Belgium caps | — | 126 |
| Career club goals | — | 190 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 74 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 82 |
Eden Hazard leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.2 for Gabriel Batistuta — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Batistuta scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hazard leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Batistuta: 80.2, Hazard: 80.3.
Make your case for Batistuta vs Hazard. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.