Who is better, Chebet or Ottey?
Merlene Ottey leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Beatrice Chebet — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Merlene Ottey above Beatrice Chebet: 87.6 vs 87.5. Merlene Ottey leads on Longevity. Beatrice Chebet leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ottey wins: Longevity
Chebet wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/beatrice-chebet-vs-merlene-ottey
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ottey leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Chebet | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 19 |
| 🇯🇲 Ottey | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 22 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChebetActive | OtteyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| World cross country titles | 2 | — |
| 5000 m world record in minutes | 13.58 | — |
| Olympic medals | — | 9 |
| World Championship medals | — | 14 |
| Olympic appearances | — | 7 |
| 200m best (sec) | — | 21.64 |
| World Indoor golds | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Merlene Ottey leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Beatrice Chebet — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Chebet scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Ottey leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chebet: 87.5, Ottey: 87.6.
Make your case for Chebet vs Ottey. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.