Who is better, Chebet or Richards-Ross?
Beatrice Chebet leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Beatrice Chebet and Sanya Richards-Ross level at 87.5. Beatrice Chebet leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Sanya Richards-Ross leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Chebet wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Richards-Ross wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/beatrice-chebet-vs-sanya-richards-ross
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Chebet leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Chebet | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 19 |
| 🇺🇸 Richards-Ross | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 147.51 | 345.4 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ChebetActive | Richards-RossRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 2 | — |
| World records | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | 5 |
| World cross country titles | 2 | — |
| 5000 m world record in minutes | 13.58 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 5 |
| 400m best (sec) | — | 48.7 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 4 |
| World Championship medals | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 88 |
Beatrice Chebet leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Sanya Richards-Ross — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Richards-Ross scores higher on honours, longevity. Chebet leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Chebet: 87.5, Richards-Ross: 87.5.
Make your case for Chebet vs Richards-Ross. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.