Who is better, Bekele or Gebrselassie?
Haile Gebrselassie leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 90.3 for Kenenisa Bekele — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Haile Gebrselassie above Kenenisa Bekele: 91.9 vs 90.3. Haile Gebrselassie leads on Longevity, Dominance, Honours. Kenenisa Bekele leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gebrselassie wins: Dominance, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Bekele wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/bekele-vs-gebrselassie
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gebrselassie leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Bekele | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,742.93 | 11,092.93 |
| 🇪🇹 Gebrselassie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,589 | 4,740 | 12,582.11 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BekeleRetired | GebrselassieRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 2 |
| World Championship golds | 5 | 4 |
| World cross-country golds | 11 | — |
| 5000 m best (s) | 757.35 | — |
| 10,000 m best (s) | 1,577.53 | 1,565.11 |
| Marathon best (s) | 7,299 | 7,439 |
| World records | — | 27 |
| Major marathon wins | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 89 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 91 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 93 |
Haile Gebrselassie leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 90.3 for Kenenisa Bekele — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bekele scores higher on peak. Gebrselassie leads on dominance, honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bekele: 90.3, Gebrselassie: 91.9.
Make your case for Bekele vs Gebrselassie. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.