Who is better, Bekele or Sotomayor?
Kenenisa Bekele leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 89.9 for Javier Sotomayor — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kenenisa Bekele above Javier Sotomayor: 90.3 vs 89.9. Kenenisa Bekele leads on Longevity, Honours. Javier Sotomayor leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bekele wins: Longevity, Honours
Sotomayor wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/bekele-vs-javier-sotomayor
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bekele leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Bekele | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,742.93 | 11,092.93 |
| 🇨🇺 Sotomayor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BekeleRetired | SotomayorRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 1 |
| World Championship golds | 5 | 2 |
| World cross-country golds | 11 | — |
| 5000 m best (s) | 757.35 | — |
| 10,000 m best (s) | 1,577.53 | — |
| Marathon best (s) | 7,299 | — |
| High jump world record (m) | — | 2.45 |
| World indoor golds | — | 4 |
| Jumps over 2.40 m | — | 21 |
| Pan American golds | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 89 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Kenenisa Bekele leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 89.9 for Javier Sotomayor — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Sotomayor scores higher on peak, dominance. Bekele leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bekele: 90.3, Sotomayor: 89.9.
Make your case for Bekele vs Sotomayor. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.