Who is better, Bekele or Isinbayeva?
Kenenisa Bekele leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 90.3 for Yelena Isinbayeva — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kenenisa Bekele and Yelena Isinbayeva level at 90.3. Kenenisa Bekele leads on Longevity. Yelena Isinbayeva leads on Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bekele wins: Longevity
Isinbayeva wins: Dominance, Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/bekele-vs-yelena-isinbayeva
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bekele leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇹 Bekele | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,742.93 | 11,092.93 |
| 🇷🇺 Isinbayeva | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14.75 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BekeleRetired | IsinbayevaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | 2 |
| World Championship golds | 5 | 3 |
| World cross-country golds | 11 | — |
| 5000 m best (s) | 757.35 | — |
| 10,000 m best (s) | 1,577.53 | — |
| Marathon best (s) | 7,299 | — |
| World records | — | 28 |
| Pole vault world record (m) | — | 5.06 |
| World indoor golds | — | 4 |
| Diamond League titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 89 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 92 |
Kenenisa Bekele leads with a GOAT score of 90.3 against 90.3 for Yelena Isinbayeva — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Isinbayeva scores higher on peak, dominance. Bekele leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bekele: 90.3, Isinbayeva: 90.3.
Make your case for Bekele vs Isinbayeva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.