Who is better, Clark or Holding?
Belinda Clark leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Michael Holding — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Clark vs Holding
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Belinda Clark above Michael Holding: 87.6 vs 87.5. Belinda Clark leads on Longevity. Michael Holding leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
ClarkWinner
87.6Clark wins: Longevity
Holding
87.5Holding wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/belinda-clark-vs-michael-holding
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Belinda Clark
87.6
Clark leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Belinda Clark
2. Michael Holding
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇯🇲 Michael Holding5 years played · career day 2,921104 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Belinda Clark5 years played · career day 1,82520 runs
-80.8% vs Holding at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Clark | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 42 |
| 🇯🇲 Holding | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 122 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Clark87.6
Holding87.5
FAQ
Where does Holding beat Clark?
Holding scores higher on peak, statistics. Clark leads on longevity.
How is the Clark vs Holding score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Clark: 87.6, Holding: 87.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Clark vs Holding. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.