GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Duckett vs Burnup

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
DuckettWinner
81.0

Duckett wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics

Burnup
81.0

Burnup wins: Longevity, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/ben-duckett-vs-cuthbert-burnup

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Ben Duckett
81.0

Duckett leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories. Bazball opener with a double century and a 2025 Champions Trophy run.

1. Ben Duckett
81.0
2. Cuthbert Burnup
81.0

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Cuthbert Burnup5 years played · career day 1,825285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Ben Duckett5 years played · career day 1,825279 runs
-2.1% vs Burnup at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Duckett004595279601
🇬🇧 Burnup004596285621

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricDuckettActiveBurnupRetired
Test runs3,000
Test centuries6
Highest Test score182
One-day international centuries3
Strike rate in Tests87
First-class runs13,614
First-class centuries30
County championships won1
Seasons played13
Highest score200
Dominance w25%7876
Peak w20%9088
Longevity w20%7680
Honours w20%7476
Statistics w15%9088

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Duckett81.0
Burnup81.0
The people
Duckett
Burnup

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Duckett vs Burnup. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →