Who is better, Johnson or Kimetto?
Ben Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 79.8 for Dennis Kimetto — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ben Johnson above Dennis Kimetto: 80.1 vs 79.8. Ben Johnson leads on Longevity, Peak. Dennis Kimetto leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Peak, Longevity
Kimetto wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ben-johnson-ath-vs-dennis-kimetto
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 208 | 632 |
| 🇰🇪 Kimetto | 0 | 0 | 70 | 154 | 420 | 544 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | KimettoRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic bronze medals | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth titles | 2 | — |
| World Indoor titles | 1 | — |
| Personal best in the 100 metres | 983 | — |
| World record marathon | — | 2.026 |
| World Marathon Majors wins | — | 2 |
| Berlin Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Chicago Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Tokyo Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Ben Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 79.8 for Dennis Kimetto — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kimetto scores higher on dominance, honours. Johnson leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 80.1, Kimetto: 79.8.
Make your case for Johnson vs Kimetto. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.