Who is better, Johnson or Aldama?
Ben Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Yamilé Aldama — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ben Johnson and Yamilé Aldama level at 80.1. Ben Johnson leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics. Yamilé Aldama leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Aldama wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/ben-johnson-ath-vs-yamile-aldama
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 40 | 88 | 208 | 632 |
| 🇬🇧 Aldama | 0 | 0 | 50 | 106 | 310 | 654 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | AldamaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Olympic bronze medals | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth titles | 2 | — |
| World Indoor titles | 1 | — |
| Personal best in the 100 metres | 983 | — |
| World indoor titles | — | 1 |
| Personal best (m) | — | 15.29 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 4 |
| World Championship finals | — | 6 |
| Years at the top level | — | 21 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 78 |
Ben Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 80.1 against 80.1 for Yamilé Aldama — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Aldama scores higher on honours, longevity. Johnson leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 80.1, Aldama: 80.1.
Make your case for Johnson vs Aldama. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.