Who is better, Roethlisberger or Easley?
Kenny Easley leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Ben Roethlisberger — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kenny Easley above Ben Roethlisberger: 81.8 vs 81.7. Kenny Easley leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Ben Roethlisberger leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Easley wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Roethlisberger wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/ben-roethlisberger-vs-kenny-easley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Easley leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Roethlisberger | 0 | 0 | 2,621 | 5,006 | 11,673 | 29,844 |
| 🇺🇸 Easley | 0 | 0 | 3 | 10 | 29 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | RoethlisbergerRetired | EasleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Super Bowl titles | 2 | — |
| Passing yards | 64,088 | — |
| Passing touchdowns | 418 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 6 | 5 |
| Regular-season wins | 165 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year awards | — | 1 |
| Career interceptions | — | 32 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | — | 3 |
| Games played | — | 89 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 88 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteKenny Easley leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.7 for Ben Roethlisberger — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Roethlisberger scores higher on longevity. Easley leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Roethlisberger: 81.7, Easley: 81.8.
Make your case for Roethlisberger vs Easley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.