Who is better, Bengi or MATUMBAMAN?
Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Bae "Bengi" Seong-ung — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen above Bae "Bengi" Seong-ung: 84.2 vs 84.1. Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads on Longevity, Statistics. Bae "Bengi" Seong-ung leads on Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →MATUMBAMAN wins: Longevity, Statistics
Bengi wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bengi-vs-matumbaman-dota
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
MATUMBAMAN leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Bengi | 0 | 0 | 60 | 148 | 328 | 492 |
| 🇫🇮 MATUMBAMAN | 0 | 0 | 58 | 126 | 388 | 722 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BengiRetired | MATUMBAMANRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 3 | — |
| LCK titles | 5 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| World finals | 4 | — |
| Professional seasons | 6 | 10 |
| The International titles | — | 1 |
| The International finals | — | 2 |
| Major titles | — | 4 |
| The International appearances | — | 7 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 84 |
Lasse "MATUMBAMAN" Urpalainen leads with a GOAT score of 84.2 against 84.1 for Bae "Bengi" Seong-ung — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bengi scores higher on dominance, honours. MATUMBAMAN leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bengi: 84.1, MATUMBAMAN: 84.2.
Make your case for Bengi vs MATUMBAMAN. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.