Who is better, Bergkamp or Walsh?
Dennis Bergkamp leads with a GOAT score of 81.8 against 81.8 for Keira Walsh — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Bergkamp vs Walsh
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Dennis Bergkamp and Keira Walsh level at 81.8. Dennis Bergkamp leads on Longevity, Statistics. Keira Walsh leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BergkampWinner
81.8Bergkamp wins: Longevity, Statistics
Walsh
81.8Walsh wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to FootballShareable URL · /compare/bergkamp-vs-keira-walsh
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇱 Dennis Bergkamp
81.8
Bergkamp leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Dennis Bergkamp
2. Keira Walsh
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇱 Dennis Bergkamp5 seasons played · career day 2,55693 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🏴 Keira Walsh5 seasons played · career day 1,82586 goals
-7.5% vs Bergkamp at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇱 Bergkamp | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 112 |
| 🏴 Walsh | 0 | 0 | 10 | 26 | 86 | 172 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BergkampRetired | WalshActive |
|---|---|---|
| Premier League titles | 3 | — |
| FA Cups | 4 | — |
| Career goals | 258 | — |
| Netherlands caps | 79 | — |
| PFA Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| UEFA Cups | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| Liga F titles | — | 2 |
| England caps | — | 90 |
| Women's Super League titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 78 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Bergkamp81.8
Walsh81.8
FAQ
Where does Walsh beat Bergkamp?
Walsh scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Bergkamp leads on statistics, longevity.
How is the Bergkamp vs Walsh score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bergkamp: 81.8, Walsh: 81.8.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Bergkamp vs Walsh. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.