GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bosanquet vs Babar

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BosanquetWinner
83.2

Bosanquet wins: Longevity, Honours

Babar
83.2

Babar wins: Statistics

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/bernard-bosanquet-vs-babar-azam

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Bernard Bosanquet
83.2

Bosanquet leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Invented the googly and won the 1905 Ashes Test at Trent Bridge with it.

1. Bernard Bosanquet
83.2
2. Babar Azam
83.2

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Bernard Bosanquet5 years played · career day 1,824298 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇵🇰 Babar Azam5 years played · career day 1,825285 runs
-4.4% vs Bosanquet at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bosanquet004597298743
🇵🇰 Babar004597285498

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBosanquetRetiredBabarActive
First-class wickets629
Test wickets25
First-class runs11,696
Best Test figures8
Tests played7
ODI centuries19
Test centuries9
T20I runs4,223
ODI batting average56
Months as world No. 130
Dominance w25%8484
Peak w20%9292
Longevity w20%7672
Honours w20%8078
Statistics w15%8492

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bosanquet83.2
Babar83.2
The people
Bosanquet
Babar

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bosanquet vs Babar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →