Who is better, Bosanquet or Brook?
Bernard Bosanquet leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.2 for Harry Brook — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bernard Bosanquet and Harry Brook level at 83.2. Bernard Bosanquet leads on Longevity. Harry Brook leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bosanquet wins: Longevity
Brook wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bernard-bosanquet-vs-harry-brook
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bosanquet leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bosanquet | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 298 | 743 |
| 🇬🇧 Brook | 0 | 0 | 45 | 99 | 232 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BosanquetRetired | BrookActive |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 629 | — |
| Test wickets | 25 | — |
| First-class runs | 11,696 | — |
| Best Test figures | 8 | — |
| Tests played | 7 | — |
| Test centuries | — | 9 |
| Test runs | — | 2,500 |
| Test average | — | 56 |
| Player of the Series awards | — | 3 |
| Twenty20 international runs | — | 900 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 92 |
Bernard Bosanquet leads with a GOAT score of 83.2 against 83.2 for Harry Brook — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Brook scores higher on peak, statistics. Bosanquet leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bosanquet: 83.2, Brook: 83.2.
Make your case for Bosanquet vs Brook. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.