Who is better, Lacombe or van Basten?
Bernard Lacombe leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Marco van Basten — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bernard Lacombe above Marco van Basten: 86.8 vs 86.7. Bernard Lacombe leads on Longevity, Statistics. Marco van Basten leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Lacombe wins: Longevity, Statistics
van Basten wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bernard-lacombe-v-vs-van-basten
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Lacombe leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Lacombe | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 306 | 632 |
| 🇳🇱 van Basten | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 96 | 168 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | LacombeRetired | van BastenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Ligue 1 goals | 255 | — |
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Ligue 1 top scorer awards | 1 | — |
| France caps | 38 | — |
| League titles | 2 | — |
| Ballon d'Or | — | 3 |
| European Cups | — | 2 |
| European Championships | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 300 |
| Serie A titles | — | 4 |
| Eredivisie top scorer | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Bernard Lacombe leads with a GOAT score of 86.8 against 86.7 for Marco van Basten — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
van Basten scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Lacombe leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Lacombe: 86.8, van Basten: 86.7.
Make your case for Lacombe vs van Basten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.