Who is better, Bernardi or Shirai?
Lorenzo Bernardi leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Takako Shirai — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Lorenzo Bernardi and Takako Shirai level at 82.4. Lorenzo Bernardi leads on Longevity. Takako Shirai leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bernardi wins: Longevity
Shirai wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bernardi-vs-takako-shirai
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bernardi leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Bernardi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 43 |
| 🇯🇵 Shirai | 0 | 0 | 60 | 132 | 396 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BernardiRetired | ShiraiRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 3 | 1 |
| World League titles | 6 | — |
| European Championship titles | 3 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | 2 |
| Italian league titles | 6 | — |
| Player of the Century | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Years with the national team | — | 8 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 82 |
Lorenzo Bernardi leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.4 for Takako Shirai — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shirai scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Bernardi leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bernardi: 82.4, Shirai: 82.4.
Make your case for Bernardi vs Shirai. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.