Who is better, Geoffrion or Tretiak?
Bernie Geoffrion leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Vladislav Tretiak — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bernie Geoffrion above Vladislav Tretiak: 90.6 vs 90.5. Bernie Geoffrion leads on Longevity, Honours, Statistics. Vladislav Tretiak leads on Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Geoffrion wins: Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Tretiak wins: Dominance
Shareable URL · /compare/bernie-geoffrion-vs-vladislav-tretiak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Geoffrion leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Geoffrion | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
| 🇷🇺 Tretiak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 18 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | GeoffrionRetired | TretiakRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Cups | 6 | — |
| Hart Trophies | 1 | — |
| Scoring titles | 2 | — |
| Career goals | 393 | — |
| Fifty-goal seasons | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 3 |
| World Championship golds | — | 10 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Soviet Player of the Year awards | — | 5 |
| Olympic medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Bernie Geoffrion leads with a GOAT score of 90.6 against 90.5 for Vladislav Tretiak — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Tretiak scores higher on dominance. Geoffrion leads on honours, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Geoffrion: 90.6, Tretiak: 90.5.
Make your case for Geoffrion vs Tretiak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.