Who is better, BeryL or Clid?
Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee leads with a GOAT score of 81.9 against 81.9 for Clid — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
BeryL vs Clid
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee and Clid level at 81.9. Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee leads on Peak, Longevity. Clid leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BeryLWinner
81.9BeryL wins: Peak, Longevity
Clid
81.9Clid wins: Dominance, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to EsportsShareable URL · /compare/beryl-lol-vs-clid-lol
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇰🇷 Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee
81.9
BeryL leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee
2. Clid
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through split year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇰🇷 Cho "BeryL" Geon-hee5 split years played · career day 1,825404 trophies
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇰🇷 Clid5 split years played · career day 1,825372 trophies
-7.9% vs BeryL at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 BeryL | 0 | 0 | 62 | 136 | 404 | 708 |
| 🇰🇷 Clid | 0 | 0 | 55 | 122 | 372 | 499 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
BeryL81.9
Clid81.9
FAQ
Where does Clid beat BeryL?
Clid scores higher on dominance, statistics. BeryL leads on peak, longevity.
How is the BeryL vs Clid score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. BeryL: 81.9, Clid: 81.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for BeryL vs Clid. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.