Who is better, Mead or O'Reilly?
Beth Mead leads with a GOAT score of 86.9 against 86.9 for Heather O'Reilly — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Beth Mead and Heather O'Reilly level at 86.9. Beth Mead leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Heather O'Reilly leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mead wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
O'Reilly wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/beth-mead-v-vs-heather-oreilly-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mead leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🏴 Mead | 0 | 0 | 55 | 116 | 334 | 699 |
| 🇺🇸 O'Reilly | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 311 | 653 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MeadActive | O'ReillyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| European Championship titles | 1 | — |
| Euro Golden Boot awards | 1 | — |
| Euro Player of the Tournament awards | 1 | — |
| WSL titles | 1 | — |
| England goals | 35 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 3 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| United States caps | — | 231 |
| United States goals | — | 47 |
| NCAA titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 93 | 89 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 84 |
Beth Mead leads with a GOAT score of 86.9 against 86.9 for Heather O'Reilly — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
O'Reilly scores higher on honours, longevity. Mead leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mead: 86.9, O'Reilly: 86.9.
Make your case for Mead vs O'Reilly. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.