Who is better, Wiegmann or Larsson?
Bettina Wiegmann leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Henrik Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bettina Wiegmann and Henrik Larsson level at 87.5. Bettina Wiegmann leads on Honours, Dominance. Henrik Larsson leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wiegmann wins: Dominance, Honours
Larsson wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bettina-wiegmann-v-vs-henrik-larsson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wiegmann leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Wiegmann | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 307 | 636 |
| 🇸🇪 Larsson | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 231 | 638 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WiegmannRetired | LarssonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 4 | — |
| Germany caps | 154 | — |
| Germany goals | 51 | — |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Champions League titles | — | 1 |
| Scottish league titles | — | 4 |
| European Golden Shoe awards | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 415 |
| Sweden goals | — | 37 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 92 |
Bettina Wiegmann leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Henrik Larsson — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Larsson scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Wiegmann leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wiegmann: 87.5, Larsson: 87.5.
Make your case for Wiegmann vs Larsson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.