Who is better, Wiegmann or Voss-Tecklenburg?
Bettina Wiegmann leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Martina Voss-Tecklenburg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bettina Wiegmann and Martina Voss-Tecklenburg level at 87.5.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Wiegmann wins: no category outright
Voss-Tecklenburg wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/bettina-wiegmann-v-vs-martina-voss-tecklenburg-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Wiegmann leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇪 Wiegmann | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 307 | 636 |
| 🇩🇪 Voss-Tecklenburg | 0 | 0 | 52 | 109 | 236 | 636 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WiegmannRetired | Voss-TecklenburgRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| European Championship titles | 4 | 4 |
| Germany caps | 154 | 125 |
| Germany goals | 51 | 27 |
| Olympic medals | 1 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | — | 3 |
| World Cup finals | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 86 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteBettina Wiegmann leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Martina Voss-Tecklenburg — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Voss-Tecklenburg does not lead any of the five categories; Wiegmann is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wiegmann: 87.5, Voss-Tecklenburg: 87.5.
Make your case for Wiegmann vs Voss-Tecklenburg. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.