Who is better, Wilson or Marshall?
Malcolm Marshall leads with a GOAT score of 89.5 against 89.4 for Betty Wilson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Wilson vs Marshall
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Malcolm Marshall above Betty Wilson: 89.5 vs 89.4. Malcolm Marshall leads on Longevity. Betty Wilson leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MarshallWinner
89.5Marshall wins: Longevity
Wilson
89.4Wilson wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/betty-wilson-vs-malcolm-marshall
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇧 Malcolm Marshall
89.5
Marshall leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Malcolm Marshall
2. Betty Wilson
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Betty Wilson5 years played · career day 2,191293 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇧 Malcolm Marshall5 years played · career day 2,19074 runs
-74.7% vs Wilson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Wilson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 227 | 445 |
| 🇧🇧 Marshall | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 41 | 224 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Marshall89.5
Wilson89.4
FAQ
Where does Wilson beat Marshall?
Wilson scores higher on peak, statistics. Marshall leads on longevity.
How is the Wilson vs Marshall score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilson: 89.4, Marshall: 89.5.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Wilson vs Marshall. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.