Who is better, Wilson or Chanderpaul?
Betty Wilson leads with a GOAT score of 89.4 against 89.4 for Shivnarine Chanderpaul — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Wilson vs Chanderpaul
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Betty Wilson and Shivnarine Chanderpaul level at 89.4. Betty Wilson leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Shivnarine Chanderpaul leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WilsonWinner
89.4Wilson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Chanderpaul
89.4Chanderpaul wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/betty-wilson-vs-shivnarine-chanderpaul
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Betty Wilson
89.4
Wilson leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Betty Wilson
2. Shivnarine Chanderpaul
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇦🇺 Betty Wilson5 years played · career day 2,191293 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇾 Shivnarine Chanderpaul5 years played · career day 1,825218 runs
-25.6% vs Wilson at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Wilson | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 227 | 445 |
| 🇬🇾 Chanderpaul | 0 | 0 | 35 | 74 | 218 | 472 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | WilsonRetired | ChanderpaulRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Test batting average | 57.46 | — |
| Test bowling average | 11.8 | — |
| Test wickets | 68 | — |
| Test runs | 862 | 11,867 |
| Tests played | 11 | 164 |
| Test centuries | — | 30 |
| Batting average | — | 51 |
| ODI runs | — | 8,778 |
| Dominance w25% | 92 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 98 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 96 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Wilson89.4
Chanderpaul89.4
FAQ
Where does Chanderpaul beat Wilson?
Chanderpaul scores higher on longevity. Wilson leads on peak, dominance, honours.
How is the Wilson vs Chanderpaul score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Wilson: 89.4, Chanderpaul: 89.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Wilson vs Chanderpaul. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.