Who is better, Congdon or Blundell?
Tom Blundell leads with a GOAT score of 83.0 against 82.9 for Bevan Congdon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Congdon vs Blundell
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Tom Blundell above Bevan Congdon: 83.0 vs 82.9. Tom Blundell leads on Honours, Dominance. Bevan Congdon leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BlundellWinner
83.0Blundell wins: Dominance, Honours
Congdon
82.9Congdon wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/bevan-congdon-vs-tom-blundell
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Tom Blundell
83.0
Blundell leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Tom Blundell
2. Bevan Congdon
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Tom Blundell5 years played · career day 1,825285 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇳🇿 Bevan Congdon5 years played · career day 1,826268 runs
-6.0% vs Blundell at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 Congdon | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 206 | 559 |
| 🇳🇿 Blundell | 0 | 0 | 45 | 96 | 285 | 621 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Blundell83.0
Congdon82.9
FAQ
Where does Congdon beat Blundell?
Congdon scores higher on longevity. Blundell leads on dominance, honours.
How is the Congdon vs Blundell score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Congdon: 82.9, Blundell: 83.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Congdon vs Blundell. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.