Who is better, Andreescu or Kuerten?
Bianca Andreescu leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.1 for Gustavo Kuerten — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bianca Andreescu above Gustavo Kuerten: 76.3 vs 76.1. Bianca Andreescu leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours. Gustavo Kuerten leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Andreescu wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Kuerten wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bianca-andreescu-vs-gustavo-kuerten
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Andreescu leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Andreescu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 🇧🇷 Kuerten | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 17 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndreescuActive | KuertenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | 3 | — |
| Masters titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 4 | — |
| Billie Jean King Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 3 |
| Career titles | — | 20 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 43 |
| Tour Finals titles | — | 1 |
| Masters 1000 titles | — | 5 |
| Year-end No. 1 | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 58 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 78 |
Bianca Andreescu leads with a GOAT score of 76.3 against 76.1 for Gustavo Kuerten — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Kuerten scores higher on longevity. Andreescu leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Andreescu: 76.3, Kuerten: 76.1.
Make your case for Andreescu vs Kuerten. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.