GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Andreescu vs Osaka

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
OsakaWinner
76.5

Osaka wins: Longevity, Statistics

Andreescu
76.3

Andreescu wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/bianca-andreescu-vs-naomi-osaka

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka
76.5

Osaka leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories. Four hard-court majors and the world No. 1 ranking at 21.

1. Naomi Osaka
76.5
2. Bianca Andreescu
76.3

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇨🇦 Bianca Andreescu5 seasons played · career day 2,1906 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇯🇵 Naomi Osaka5 seasons played · career day 2,9214 titles
-33.3% vs Andreescu at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇨🇦 Andreescu000159
🇯🇵 Osaka000005

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricAndreescuActiveOsakaActive
Grand Slam singles titles1
WTA titles3
Masters titles1
Career-high ranking4
Billie Jean King Cup appearances2
Grand Slam titles4
US Open titles2
Australian Open titles2
Weeks at No. 125
Career titles7
Year-end No. 11
Dominance w25%7674
Peak w20%9288
Longevity w20%5866
Honours w20%7876
Statistics w15%7880

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Osaka76.5
Andreescu76.3
The people
Andreescu
Osaka

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Andreescu vs Osaka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →