Who is better, Andreescu or Osaka?
Naomi Osaka leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 76.3 for Bianca Andreescu — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Naomi Osaka above Bianca Andreescu: 76.5 vs 76.3. Naomi Osaka leads on Longevity, Statistics. Bianca Andreescu leads on Peak, Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Osaka wins: Longevity, Statistics
Andreescu wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bianca-andreescu-vs-naomi-osaka
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Osaka leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Andreescu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 9 |
| 🇯🇵 Osaka | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndreescuActive | OsakaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Slam singles titles | 1 | — |
| WTA titles | 3 | — |
| Masters titles | 1 | — |
| Career-high ranking | 4 | — |
| Billie Jean King Cup appearances | 2 | — |
| Grand Slam titles | — | 4 |
| US Open titles | — | 2 |
| Australian Open titles | — | 2 |
| Weeks at No. 1 | — | 25 |
| Career titles | — | 7 |
| Year-end No. 1 | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 58 | 66 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 76 |
| Statistics w15% | 78 | 80 |
Naomi Osaka leads with a GOAT score of 76.5 against 76.3 for Bianca Andreescu — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Andreescu scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Osaka leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Andreescu: 76.3, Osaka: 76.5.
Make your case for Andreescu vs Osaka. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.