GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Bowes vs Chandrasekhar

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BowesWinner
84.7

Bowes wins: Honours

Chandrasekhar
84.7

Chandrasekhar wins: Peak

Candidates
Locked to Cricket

Shareable URL · /compare/bill-bowes-vs-b-s-chandrasekhar

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Bill Bowes
84.7

Bowes leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. Yorkshire spearhead with 1,639 first-class wickets at under 17 apiece.

1. Bill Bowes
84.7
2. B. S. Chandrasekhar
84.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Centuries per year

Career timeline · Centuries per year

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through year 5 · Centuries per year
1. 🇬🇧 Bill Bowes5 years played · career day 1,826295 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇮🇳 B. S. Chandrasekhar5 years played · career day 2,19186 runs
-70.8% vs Bowes at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇬🇧 Bowes004597222645
🇮🇳 Chandrasekhar0001866145

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 years are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricBowesRetiredChandrasekharRetired
First-class wickets1,639
First-class average16
Test wickets68242
County championships won7
Seasons with 100 wickets9
Tests played58
Five-wicket hauls16
Ten-wicket matches2
Test bowling average29.74
Dominance w25%8282
Peak w20%9094
Longevity w20%8282
Honours w20%8076
Statistics w15%9292

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Bowes84.7
Chandrasekhar84.7
The people
Bowes
Chandrasekhar

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Bowes vs Chandrasekhar. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →