Who is better, Bowes or Ecclestone?
Bill Bowes leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Sophie Ecclestone — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bill Bowes above Sophie Ecclestone: 84.7 vs 84.6. Bill Bowes leads on Longevity, Statistics. Sophie Ecclestone leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bowes wins: Longevity, Statistics
Ecclestone wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bill-bowes-vs-sophie-ecclestone
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bowes leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Bowes | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 222 | 645 |
| 🇬🇧 Ecclestone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 247 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BowesRetired | EcclestoneActive |
|---|---|---|
| First-class wickets | 1,639 | — |
| First-class average | 16 | — |
| Test wickets | 68 | — |
| County championships won | 7 | — |
| Seasons with 100 wickets | 9 | — |
| T20 World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| ODI wickets | — | 100 |
| T20 international wickets | — | 130 |
| Commonwealth medals | — | 1 |
| Months as No. 1 bowler | — | 50 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Bill Bowes leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Sophie Ecclestone — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ecclestone scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Bowes leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bowes: 84.7, Ecclestone: 84.6.
Make your case for Bowes vs Ecclestone. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.