Who is better, Cook or Heaney?
Bill Cook leads with a GOAT score of 88.2 against 88.0 for Geraldine Heaney — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cook vs Heaney
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bill Cook above Geraldine Heaney: 88.2 vs 88.0. Bill Cook leads on Statistics, Peak, Dominance. Geraldine Heaney leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CookWinner
88.2Cook wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Heaney
88.0Heaney wins: Longevity, Honours
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/bill-cook-vs-geraldine-heaney
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Bill Cook
88.2
Cook leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bill Cook
2. Geraldine Heaney
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Bill Cook5 seasons played · career day 1,825345 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Geraldine Heaney5 seasons played · career day 2,55659 points
-82.9% vs Cook at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Cook | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 345 | 692 |
| 🇨🇦 Heaney | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 86 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cook88.2
Heaney88.0
FAQ
Where does Heaney beat Cook?
Heaney scores higher on honours, longevity. Cook leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
How is the Cook vs Heaney score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cook: 88.2, Heaney: 88.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cook vs Heaney. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.