Who is better, Mazeroski or Cepeda?
Orlando Cepeda leads with a GOAT score of 86.0 against 85.9 for Bill Mazeroski — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Mazeroski vs Cepeda
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Orlando Cepeda above Bill Mazeroski: 86.0 vs 85.9. Orlando Cepeda leads on Dominance. Bill Mazeroski leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CepedaWinner
86.0Cepeda wins: Dominance
Mazeroski
85.9Mazeroski wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to BaseballShareable URL · /compare/bill-mazeroski-vs-orlando-cepeda
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇵🇷 Orlando Cepeda
86.0
Cepeda leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Orlando Cepeda
2. Bill Mazeroski
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇵🇷 Orlando Cepeda5 seasons played · career day 1,825157 home runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Bill Mazeroski5 seasons played · career day 1,82648 home runs
-69.4% vs Cepeda at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Mazeroski | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 37 | 93 |
| 🇵🇷 Cepeda | 0 | 0 | 25 | 52 | 157 | 243 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Cepeda86.0
Mazeroski85.9
FAQ
Where does Mazeroski beat Cepeda?
Mazeroski scores higher on longevity. Cepeda leads on dominance.
How is the Mazeroski vs Cepeda score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Mazeroski: 85.9, Cepeda: 86.0.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Mazeroski vs Cepeda. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.